Can I record a conversation without the other person's consent?
It depends — recording your own conversation is usually fine, but secretly recording someone else's is not, and these are two completely different situations. There is no clear "one-party consent" statute in Lithuania — a court assesses lawfulness case by case. When you record a conversation you are a party to, and do so to defend your own violated rights, the Supreme Court of Lithuania treats such a recording as lawful and admissible evidence. But secretly recording another's private conversation you are not part of is equated with prohibited covert operational activity and can bring liability under Article 167 of the Criminal Code. The key point people miss: recording and publishing are different things, and even a lawfully made recording may not be freely published, as this is separately restricted by CC 2.23 and Article 168.
📋 The rules
- Recording your own conversation to defend your rights is treated by the courts (Supreme Court) as lawful and admissible evidence
- Secretly recording another's private conversation you are not part of is unlawful (equated with covert operational activity)
- Unlawful collection of private-life information — Art. 167 CC (up to 3 years)
- Recording and publishing are different things; publishing is restricted by CC 2.23 and Art. 168 CC
- There is no clear "one-party consent" statute — a court assesses lawfulness case by case
🔓 Exceptions
- A recording in a public place (a café, a shop) is generally not treated as a breach of private life
- A provocative, pre-arranged recording of another's private conversation is unlawful and not admissible evidence
- A lawfully made recording still may not be published if it breaches the person's private life
⚠️ Penalties & fines
The line is simple: you may record your own conversation, not another's in secret, and publishing is yet another matter. When you record a conversation you are a party to, and do so to defend your own violated rights, the Supreme Court of Lithuania treats such a recording as lawful and admissible evidence in a civil case. But secretly recording another's private conversation you are not part of is equated with prohibited covert operational activity and can bring criminal liability under Article 167 of the Criminal Code — up to three years in prison. What people miss: even a lawfully made recording may not be freely published — publishing is separately restricted by CC 2.23 and Article 168. These are private-prosecution offences, so the injured person starts the process, and an unlawfully obtained recording can be ruled inadmissible in court.
📎 Official sources
- e-seimas · Civil Code, Article 2.23 →
- e-seimas · Criminal Code, Articles 167 and 168 →
- LAT · Supreme Court of Lithuania case-law →
❓ Frequently asked
Can I record my own conversation with another person?
Yes, recording a conversation you are a party to in order to defend your own violated rights is treated in case law as lawful and admissible evidence. This is especially recognised in contract or debt disputes, where the recording is made for defence rather than to harm the other person.
Can I secretly record another's conversation?
No, secretly recording a private conversation you are not part of is unlawful, because it is equated with covert operational activity that only state authorities may use. Such recording can bring criminal liability under Criminal Code Article 167 and is usually not admitted as evidence in court.
Is a recording valid as evidence in court?
A recording of your own conversation is generally admissible in a civil case and is assessed together with the other evidence. However, a recording of another's conversation obtained unlawfully — for example secretly or by provocation — may be ruled inadmissible and rejected.
Can I publish a recording of a conversation?
Recording and publishing are separate acts, so even a lawfully made recording may not be freely made public. Disclosure of private-life data is restricted by CC 2.23 and Criminal Code Article 168, and unlawful publishing can bring civil or even criminal liability.
Is there a "one-party consent" rule?
Lithuania has no clear statute allowing you to record anything simply because you are a party to the conversation. A court assesses lawfulness case by case, weighing the purpose, place, means, provocation and good faith, so there is no universal "one-party" rule.
🔎 Common searches
What people search to land here:
- “can i record a conversation without consent”
- “recording a conversation as evidence”
- “secret audio recording in court”
- “criminal code article 167”
- “can i record a phone call”
- “recording conversations law lithuania”