Can an insurer demand my medical file?

Verdict: Targeted questions yes — your full file, almost never

Health questions on application and proportionate checks on claims are lawful. Blanket “send us your complete medical record” authorisations are the overreach to strike out.

Health data is Art. 9 material: insurers process it through explicit consent and insurance-specific legal gates — but consent must be specific, and that is where your leverage sits. Lawful and normal: health questionnaires for life or income-protection policies (answer truthfully — misrepresentation voids cover), and claim-related verification of the condition claimed. The overreach pattern: a signature authorising release of your entire medical history, from any provider, indefinitely. Data minimisation applies to insurers like everyone else — the proportionate version is: specified records, specified period, related to the specified condition. You may cross out and narrow an authorisation before signing; national insurance and medical-professional rules widely support routing medical detail to the insurer’s medical adviser (bound by secrecy) rather than claim handlers — ask for exactly that. Your rights against the insurer: access to your underwriting and claims file including medical assessments; rectification of wrong health codings that follow you between policies. Genetic data enjoys extra protection: several countries prohibit insurers from requesting predictive genetic-test results outright. Feeling squeezed — “sign the blanket form or no payout”? Put the narrowing in writing; refusal to accept a proportionate authorisation is complaint material for both the DPA and your national insurance ombudsman.

🗺️Country differences. Insurance-contract law, medical-adviser routing and genetic-testing bans are national; the specific-consent and minimisation logic holds everywhere.

Verified against the sources above on 18 July 2026. Information, not legal advice.

← Is this allowed?📞 Your data protection authority