My photo is being used in an ad or to sell something — what now?

Commercial use of your face without consent is the clearest image-rights violation there is — takedown plus payment is the normal outcome, not just takedown.

  1. Evidence, then valuationScreenshots of the ad in place (platform, dates, reach if visible), the product it sells, and where they got the photo. Commercial misuse claims are worth money — document like it.
  2. One formal demand letterTo the advertiser: cease use immediately on all channels, disclose where the image came from and everywhere it ran (Art. 15!), and pay a licence-equivalent fee — what they would have paid a model for this use. Fourteen days. Real companies fold here; the fee ask is standard, not greedy.
  3. Report the ad at platform levelAd platforms ban unauthorised likeness use — report via the ad itself (the “why am I seeing this / report ad” flow). Scam ads with stolen faces (fake endorsements, crypto scams) have priority queues; report those as scams, not just image misuse.
  4. AI-generated “you” counts doubleA deepfaked face or voice endorsing something is both image misuse and, under the AI Act, unlabelled synthetic content — report to the platform citing both, and to your DPA. Public figures fight this weekly; the tools work for everyone.
  5. Escalate where the money isNo response: DPA complaint (unlawful processing, no consent basis exists for commercial likeness use) AND small-claims or civil action for the fee plus damages — national portrait/image-rights law does the heavy lifting, and courts award licence fees routinely. A photographer’s copyright in the photo can be a parallel claim if you took or own it.

Why this one is winnable: courts across Europe treat commercial exploitation of a person’s likeness as the strongest image-rights case — no journalism defence, no public-interest balance, just someone monetising your face. The licence-fee logic (“pay what lawful use would have cost”) gives judges an easy number, which is why demand letters citing it settle. Where the “advertiser” is a ghost (scam ads), skip to platform + police + de-indexing, and warn your own network — stolen-face scam ads recycle across platforms.

Verified against the sources above on 18 July 2026. Information, not legal advice.

← What now?✍️ Generate this letter — free📞 Your data protection authority